Go to Content 1 Go to Home 2 Go to Navigation 3 Go to Search 4 Go to Sitemap 5
Abrir menu principal de navegação
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • inss
  • assinatura
  • cnh social
  • mei
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • inss
  • assinatura
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
  • GOV.BR
    • Services
      • Search services by
        • Categories
        • Departments
        • States
      • Services by target audience
        • Citizens
        • Companies
        • Departments and Public Entities
        • Other segments (NGOs, social organizations, etc)
    • Application Gallery
    • Navigation
      • Acessibility
      • Sitemap
    • Government of Brazil
      • Latest News
        • 2021
        • 2022
Useful Links
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Você está aqui: Home Matters News General Superintendence recommends condemnation of port service companies
Info

Notícias

General Superintendence recommends condemnation of port service companies

Case is to be judged by CADE’s Tribunal, responsible for the final decision
Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
Published in Oct 08, 2014 09:00 AM Updated in Nov 01, 2022 02:25 PM

The General Superintendence of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE recommended, in opinions published on 8 October 2014, the condemnation of four port operators for adopting practices with anticompetitive potential that would have affected port service users in the ports of Salvador, in the state of Bahia; Rio Grande in the state of Rio Grande do Sul; and Santos, in the state of São Paulo. The charged companies are Tecon Salvador S/A, Intermarítima Terminais Ltda., Tecon Rio Grande S/A, and Rodrimar S/A Transportes, Equipamentos Industriais e Armazéns Gerais.

The companies operate in port terminals and are responsible for loading and unloading ships. They detain strong market power in the handling and positioning of unloaded goods their terminals.

The port operators also perform a second activity, they storage goods until they are cleared for export or internalization. In this market, the companies compete with the so called independent customs warehouse, which are places outside the port’s primary zone that also offer storage services.

The investigated conducts by the General Superintendence were the following:

- Administrative Proceeding no. 08012.003824/2002-84: it was verified that between 2000 and 2006, the port operators Tecon Salvador and Intermarítima Terminais, in addition to the usual positioning rates denominated box rate, charged extra fees to unload import containers destined to the competitors customs warehouses.

- Administrative Proceeding no. 08012.005422/2003-03: it was verified that Tecon Rio Grande, between 2002 and 2010, charged in addition to the box rate, a “15-day Storage Fee” for import containers subjected to the Declaration of Customs Transit regime unloaded in less than 48 hours.

- Administrative Proceeding no. 08012.001518/2006-37: it was verified that, between March 2006 and February 2012, the operating company of the Santos port terminal, Rodrimar, charged customs warehouses an alleged “Segregation and Delivery Service” fee in addition to the box rate.

- Administrative Proceeding no. 08012.009690/2006-39: it was investigated the charge by Rodrimar, between 2004 and 2005, of an alleged cost recovery rate in reference to the implantation of the ISPS Code – a set of security rules.

All cases have the charge of determined rates by the port operators themselves for an alleged provision of additional services. CADE’s General Superintendence understood, however, that in these cases the free creation of new fees by the operators - in addition to the box rate, which already pays for the positioning services of the terminal – has potential to generate anticompetitive effects. This potential exists due to the fact that by adopting such conducts, the operators, which already own a dominant position in the terminal, may discriminate the goods stored in competing customs warehouses and may increase the costs of these competitors.

CADE already judged similar cases, for example the Administrative Proceeding no. 08012.007443/1999-17, in which the companies Terminal para Contêineres da Margem Direita – Tecondi, Libra Terminais Santos S.A. – Terminal 37, Usiminas and Santos Brasil – Tecon were condemned for imposing a “Segregation and Delivery Service” rate to customs warehouses in the port of Santos.

The four cases are now to be judged by CADE’s Tribunal, responsible for rendering a final decision. If condemned, the companies could pay a fine from 0,1% to 20% of their revenues, among other penalties foreseen in the law.

New investigation – The General Superintendence determined, also on 8 October, the opening of a new administrative proceeding to investigate the charge, by Tecon Rio Grande, of a deposit fee to be paid for imported goods or goods returning to Brazil unloaded in its terminal. With the opening of this proceeding, the company will be notified to present its defense.

Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
Reset Cookies
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Acesso àInformação
All content on this site is published under license Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.
Voltar ao topo da página
Fale Agora Refazer a busca