Go to Content 1 Go to Home 2 Go to Navigation 3 Go to Search 4 Go to Sitemap 5
Abrir menu principal de navegação
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • assinatura
  • mei
  • inss
  • enem
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • assinatura
  • mei
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
  • GOV.BR
    • Services
      • Search services by
        • Categories
        • Departments
        • States
      • Services by target audience
        • Citizens
        • Companies
        • Departments and Public Entities
        • Other segments (NGOs, social organizations, etc)
    • Application Gallery
    • Navigation
      • Acessibility
      • Sitemap
    • Government of Brazil
      • Latest News
        • 2021
        • 2022
Useful Links
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Você está aqui: Home Matters News CADE upholds preventive measure against SECIPE
Info

Notícias

DECISION

CADE upholds preventive measure against SECIPE

Tribunal dismissed medical association’s appeal
Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
Published in Aug 20, 2026 10:34 AM
f82c9c49-edb8-45a8-b320-8b9dc9e6de91.png

On 5 August, the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) dismissed the appeal of the Serviço de Cirurgia Pediátrica S/S (SECIPE) and upheld the preventive measure imposed by the Office of the Superintendent General at CADE (SG).

The case was initiated following an investigation into an alleged influence on the adoption of uniform commercial practices among paediatric surgeons affiliated with SECIPE. According to the case records, the association centralised commercial negotiations and adopted practices related to fixing prices of medical fees.

In the appeal, SECIPE claimed a violation of its right to due process and full defence. It also argued that the requirements for upholding the preventive measure were not met, as it does not operate as a vehicle for collective collusion, nor interferes with the individual professional practice of its members.

Commissioner Carlos Jacques, rapporteur of the case, dismissed the appeal stating that the issue relating to the access to the case records was later resolved. He also highlighted that the appellant had been given the opportunity to be heard during the proceedings.

On the merits, the rapporteur found that the requirements that justified the adoption of the preventive measure remained in place. According to the vote, there is indication of influence to the adoption of uniform commercial practices pointing to the centralisation of commercial negotiations involving paediatric surgeons practicing in Campo Grande, in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS). 

Mr Jacques also noted that, according to previous findings, SECIPE represents a significant part of the professionals practicing in the city. He further stated that the continuation of the conduct under investigation during the proceedings may cause irreversible harm to competitive dynamics and healthcare consumers.

Thus, the commissioner voted to fully uphold the preventive measure imposed by the SG. It also recommended expanding the market test by sending formal requests for information to hospitals in Campo Grande, to further examine the negotiations carried out with the association.

Access Appeal No.08700.005397/2026-98

Communications and Public Transparency
Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
Reset Cookies
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Acesso àInformação
All content on this site is published under license Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.
Voltar ao topo da página
Fale Agora Refazer a busca