Go to Content 1 Go to Home 2 Go to Navigation 3 Go to Search 4 Go to Sitemap 5
Abrir menu principal de navegação
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • inss
  • assinatura
  • cnh social
  • mei
Most searched terms
  • imposto de renda
  • inss
  • assinatura
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
  • GOV.BR
    • Services
      • Search services by
        • Categories
        • Departments
        • States
      • Services by target audience
        • Citizens
        • Companies
        • Departments and Public Entities
        • Other segments (NGOs, social organizations, etc)
    • Application Gallery
    • Navigation
      • Acessibility
      • Sitemap
    • Government of Brazil
      • Latest News
        • 2021
        • 2022
Useful Links
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
  • Application Gallery
  • Get involved
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Você está aqui: Home Matters News CADE sentences solar heaters bid rigging cartel
Info

Notícias

CADE sentences solar heaters bid rigging cartel

Irregularities reached social housing programs. Infringements happened in cities of the state of São Paulo
Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
Published in Sep 30, 2015 10:00 AM Updated in Nov 01, 2022 02:30 PM

The Tribunal of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE, condemned, on 16 September 2015, six companies for cartel on the market of solar heaters. The bid rigging reached public procurements to build houses to low-income families by the Housing and Urban Development Company of the state of São Paulo (CDHU in its acronym in Portuguese). The fines sum BRL 21.4 million (Administrative Proceeding 08012.001273/2010-24).

The condemned companies are Astéria Incorporações e Construções Ltda, Tuma Instalações Térmicas Ltda., Sol Tecnologia em Energias Renováveis e Obras Ltda. – former Soletrol Tecnologia em Energias Renováveis e Obras Ltda., Bosch Termotecnologia Ltda. – former Heliotek Máquinas e Equipamentos Ltda., Enalter Engenharia, Indústria e Comércio Limitada and Aquecedor Solar Transsen Ltda.
The infringements happened in two public bids, conducted in 2009 and 2010.

According to Commissioner João Paulo de Resende, who issued a review vote on the case, evidence of cartel was found throughout the investigation period. “Among the evidence there are identical offers, lack of competition in the second phase of the public bids, lot division and sub hiring of one competitor by the other.” said the Commissioner.
According to Resende, the similarity among initial proposals given by the companies clearly shows the collusion among the parties. “This similarity was a mechanism of information exchange among the cartel participants, ensuring that the settlement arranged prior to the opening of the procurement would be kept”, explained the Commissioner.

Regarding the participants of the bid that were not part of the group, the practice would also indicate the intention of the cartel members to obtain the lot, discouraging them of an eventual fierce dispute in the bid’s second phase, which could reduce the winner’s final profit.

It was also confirmed that the winners of each lot ended up being those desired by the cartel members, before the logic of the proximity of their head-quarters, and that the bids period was used as a forum of alternating proposals among the companies to simulate a competition that has not really existed.

Another evidence of irregularity was the low dispute in all lots of the first and the second public bids. The companies argued that the demand for a previous experience and the social capital limited the participation of the parties in more than one public bid. The claim was not accepted by CADE, which determined that several companies had the conditions to compete on more than one lot, and some of them were even leaders in their market segment, having opted for submitting a technical portfolio inferior to the capacity they actually had during the proposal analysis process.

João Paulo Resende also explained that the concerted behavior among the parties could have aimed not only imposing monopoly prices to the sector, but also hampering competitor’s prices, causing sufficient competitive damage to the market. Furthermore, the Commissioner stated that the probability of cumulative occurrence of the lot overlaps was very low.

Another irregularity was the need of approval to the participation on the public bid by the National Department of Solar Heating (DASOL in its Portuguese acronym), an association controlled by the cartelist companies. The requirement made the participation of smaller companies in the bid impossible.

Several Cities - The collusion among the companies has affected social housing projects in several regions of the state of São Paul, as Presidente Prudente, Campinas, Arararaquara, Ribeirão Preto, Baixada Santista, Vale do Paraíba, Sorocaba, Maurília, Bauru, Araçatuba, São José do Rio Preto and Taubaté.

“The cartel has created a direct impact in the account of the state of São Paulo, in addition to causing damage to the competition on needed inputs to the construction of households of social programs run by CDHU. The effects of the conduct affected the local budged, resources that would benefit directly the population from the state of Sao Paulo”, said the Reporting Commissioner for the case, Márcio de Oliveira Júnior, on 05 August 2015.

The accusations against the Brazilian Association of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, Ventilation and Heating (ABRAVA in its Portuguese acronym) and against two individuals were archived. The behavior of the company Wendliz Bernardo ME, which is alleged to have acted together with the condemned parties, will be investigated by CADE’s General Superintendence.

Share by Facebook Share by Twitter Share by LinkedIn Share by WhatsApp link to Copy to Clipboard
  • Access to Information
    • About us
      • Our History
      • Structure
      • Administrative Tribunal
      • Office of the Superintendent-General
      • Department of Economic Studies
      • Office of the Attorney-General at CADE
      • Management Office
      • Services offered
      • Strategic Planning
    • Actions and Programs
  • Content Centers
    • CADE in Figures
    • Legislation
      • Brazilian Constitution
      • Laws
      • Statutes of CADE
      • Decrees
      • Resolutions
    • Publications
      • Guidelines
      • Economic Studies
      • Papers
      • Journal of Competition Defense
      • Letter of Services
      • CADE Yearbook 2019
      • CADE's contributions
  • Matters
    • Bilateral Cooperation
    • Judgment Sessions
    • Leniency Program
      • Applicable Laws
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2024
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2023
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2022
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases 2021
      • Images
      • Statistics
      • Applicable Laws
      • Decisions on Leniency Agreement Cases
      • Template Documents
      • Publications
      • Guidelines for Cade's Antritrust Leniency Program
    • Multilateral Cooperation
    • News
    • Noticias en español
    • Events
      • ICN Merger Workshop 2022
  • Organisational Structure
    • Office of the President
    • Administrative Tribunal
    • Office of the Superintendent-General
    • Department of Economic Studies
    • Office of the Attorney General at CADE
    • Federal Prosecution Services at CADE
    • Management Office
  • Service Channels
    • Case Search
    • Contact Us
    • Report a Violation
Reset Cookies
Social Networks
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Acesso àInformação
All content on this site is published under license Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.
Voltar ao topo da página
Fale Agora Refazer a busca